Introduction to the Subject of Fluoridation
http://users.rcn.com/mgfree/Medical/Fluorine/FluorineApathy.html
"TELL A LIE LOUD ENOUGH AND LONG ENOUGH AND PEOPLE WILL BELIEVE IT." --Adolph Hitler.
"FLUORIDE IS SAFE AND EFFECTIVE IN THE PREVENTION OF TOOTH DECAY, AND NO FURTHER STUDIES OF ITS EFFECTS ON HUMAN HEALTH ARE NECESSARY." (Official Dentist's Fluoridation PR booklet)
"The plain fact that fluorine is an insidious poison, harmful, toxic and cumulative in its effects, even when ingested in minimal amounts, will remain unchanged no matter how many times it will be repeated in print that fluoridation of the water supply is 'safe'." Ludwig Gross, M.D., former Chief of Veterans Administration Cancer Research, Bronx, NY.
--Fluorine has the strongest effect of all the halogens. Fluorine is one of the major ingredients in the controversial psycho-active psychiatric drug PROZAC (Fluoxetene Hydrochloride), and also in deadly Sarin military nerve gas, U.S. designation GB. (Isopropyl-Methyl-Phosphoryl Fluoride).
once you remove the fluorine from Sarin, all that remains is a non-toxic acid. In other words, fluorine--the same fluorine that is in our drinking water--is what gives sarin its "kick".
--The infamous date-rape hypnotic drug "Roofs" (Rohypnol) is fluorinated Valium, which is reportedly 20-30 times more potent than Valium alone. Note the following article: "DEA WANTS 'DATE RAPE' DRUG CLASSIFIED. Washington - An illegal sedative nicknamed the "date rape" drug should be put in the same category as heroin, cocaine and LSD in the next three months, the Drug Enforcement Administration said Thursday. The agency recommended that Rohypnol, connected to more than 2,400 criminal investigations nationwide, be declared a Schedule 1 drug, DEA spokesman Jim McGivney said." (Page 6, Anchorage Daily News, June 21, 1996.)
--Fluorine is widely added to drinking water today strictly as mass-medication, supposedly to help the teeth of children under 14 years of age. In spite of the initial stated purpose of "helping the teeth of children under 14", our military bases were among the first drinking water supplies to be involuntarily fluoridated over 40 years ago.
Sodium fluoride, a hazardous-waste by-product from the manufacture of aluminum, is a common ingredient in rat and cockroach poisons, anesthetics, hypnotics, psychiatric drugs, military nerve gas, and U.S. drinking water.
Advertisements by Alcoa Aluminum recommending that we add sodium fluoride to our drinking water supply, can be found in old periodicals dated BEFORE fluoridation was officially approved by the authorities. Fluoride promoter Oscar Ewing, head of the Federal Security Agency (FSA) senior to the U.S. Public Health Service in 1951, left the employ of Alcoa Aluminum not long before he headed up the U.S. fluoridation campaign in the early 1950's. (Follow the money)
Toxic sodium fluoride and its more toxic fluorinated cousins like potassium fluoride have historically been quite expensive to properly and safely dispose of, until around 1950 when some industries with an overabundance of this toxic waste actually convinced the public on the terrifically insane but highly profitable idea of selling it to the public at a 20,000% markup, injecting it into our fresh water supply, and then DRINKING it.
Independent scientific evidence over the past 50 years reveals that fluoride allegedly shortens our life span, promotes cancer and various mental disturbances, accelerates osteoporosis and broken hips in old folks, and makes us stupid, docile, and subservient, all in one package. One broad study found a direct relationship between areas that were fluoridated, and reports of hip fractures among the elderly.
$20,000 REWARD FOR ANY PROOF THAT FLUORIDE WORKS. Dr. Robert Mick, DDS, was one of the original scientists who promoted fluoridation, until he did his own animal studies on sodium fluoride in the late 1940's and then abruptly changed his mind after authorities ordered him to cover up his test results. He refused, and proceeded to do some more research on those very authorities.
Dr. Mick's studies prompted him to confidently present this challenge: "$20,000 to the first individual who can provide one copy of any controlled experiment with any of the U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) recommended fluorides in water, at the USPHS recommended parts-per-million, which shows that poisonous fluorides are safe and will cause no future body harm."
Dr. Mick's $20,000 offer has been valid since the 1950's, but per a 1991 radio interview, Dr. Mick said that nobody had yet presented even one claim to him in hopes of collecting the reward. His address is 916 Stone Road, Laurel Springs, New Jersey. He put his money where his mouth is, with no takers. Kidney disease, by definition, lowers the efficiency of the kidneys, which is your main route of fluoride elimination. People with kidney disease also shouldn't drink fluoridated water. Cases are on record (Annapolis, Maryland, 1979) where kidney patients on dialysis machines died, due to a fluoride overdose in the city water supply. There is no data as to what effects "standard" fluoridated water causes to kidney patients on dialysis, but this should be highly questioned.
WHEN DID THIS FLUORIDATION MADNESS BEGIN?
The first occurrence of fluoridated drinking water was found in Germany's Nazi prison camps, which were maintained partly by I.G. Farben. The Gestapo had little concern about fluoride's supposed effect on children's teeth; their alleged reason for mass-medicating water with sodium fluoride was to sterilize humans and force them into calm submission. (Ref. book: "The Crime and Punishment of I.G. Farben" by Joseph Borkin.
I.G. FARBEN DEVELOPED FLUORINATED SARIN AND SOMAN NERVE GAS: The name "SARIN" is an acronym of the names of the four key I.G. Farben employees involved in its initial chemical formulation and production: Schrader, Ambros, Rudriger, and Van Der Linde. Otto Ambros was the production chief of I.G. Farben's poison gas facilities in Germany. (See Ambros' photo on p. 286 of "World Without Cancer" by G. Edward Griffin.)
Sarin was developed to replace deadly Malathion and Zyklon B nerve gases, specifically with the intent to exterminate millions of people. Fluoride-bearing Sarin was reportedly so strong, "it made Zyklon B look like underarm deodorant." (The Dickinson Statement, "Health Consciousness", October 1988)
PROFESSIONAL TESTIMONY:
The following letter was received by the Lee Foundation for Nutritional Research, Milwaukee Wisconsin, on 2 October 1954, from Mr. Charles Perkins, a chemist:
"I have your letter of September 29 asking for further documentation regarding a statement made in my book, The Truth About Water Fluoridation, to the effect that the idea of water fluoridation was brought to England from Russia by the Russian Communist Kreminoff.
"In the 1930's, Hitler and the German Nazi's envisioned a world to be dominated and controlled by a Nazi philosophy of pan-Germanism. The German chemists worked out a very ingenious and far-reaching plan of mass-control which was submitted to and adopted by the German General Staff. This plan was to control the population in any given area through mass medication of drinking water supplies. By this method they could control the population in whole areas, reduce population by water medication that would produce sterility in women, and so on. In this scheme of mass-control, sodium fluoride occupied a prominent place. ...,
"Repeated doses of infinitesimal amounts of fluoride will in time reduce an individual's power to resist domination, by slowly poisoning and narcotizing a certain area of the brain, thus making him submissive to the will of those who wish to govern him. [A convenient invisible lobotomy]
"The real reason behind water fluoridation is not to benefit children's teeth. If this were the real reason there are many ways in which it could be done that are much easier, cheaper, and far more effective. The real purpose behind water fluoridation is to reduce the resistance of the masses to domination and control and loss of liberty.
"When the Nazis under Hitler decided to go into Poland, both the German General Staff and the Russian General Staff exchanged scientific and military ideas, plans, and personnel, and the scheme of mass control through water medication was seized upon by the Russian Communists because it fitted ideally into their plan to communize the world. ...
"I was told of this entire scheme by a German chemist who was an official of the great Farben chemical industries and was also prominent in the Nazi movement at the time. I say this with all the earnestness and sincerity of a scientist who has spent nearly 20 years' research into the chemistry, biochemistry, physiology and pathology of fluorine--any person who drinks artificially fluorinated water for a period of one year or more will never again be the same person mentally or physically." CHARLES E. PERKINS, Chemist, 2 October 1954.
Quoting Einstein's nephew, Dr. E.H. Bronner (a chemist who had also been a prisoner of war during WWII) in a letter printed in The Catholic Mirror, Springfield, MA, January 1952:
"It appears that the citizens of Massachusetts are among the 'next' on the agenda of the water poisoners. "There is a sinister network of subversive agents, Godless 'intellectual' parasites, working in our country today whose ramifications grow more extensive, more successful and more alarming each new year and whose true objective is to demoralize, paralyze and destroy our great Republic--from within if they can, according to their plan--for their own possession. "The tragic success they have already attained in their long siege to destroy the moral fiber of American life is now one of their most potent footholds towards their own ultimate victory over us. "Fluoridation of our community water systems can well become their most subtle weapon for our sure physical and mental deterioration.
"As a research chemist of established standing, I built within the past 22 years, 3 American chemical plants and licensed 6 of my 53 patents. Based on my years of practical experience in the health-food and chemical field, let me warn: fluoridation of drinking water is criminal insanity, sure national suicide. Don't do it.
"Even in small quantities, sodium fluoride is a deadly poison to which no effective antidote has been found. Every exterminator knows that it is the most efficient rat-killer. ... Sodium fluoride is entirely different from organic calcium-fluoro-phosphate needed by our bodies and provided by nature, in God's great providence and love, to build and strengthen our bones and our teeth. This organic calcium-fluoro-phosphate, derived from proper foods, is an edible organic salt, insoluble in water and assimilable by the human body, whereas the non-organic sodium fluoride used in fluoridating water is instant poison to the body and fully water soluble. The body refuses to assimilate it.
"Careful, bonafide laboratory experimentation by conscientious, patriotic research chemists, and actual medical experience, have both revealed that instead of preserving or promoting 'dental health,' fluoridated drinking water destroys teeth, before adulthood and after, by the destructive mottling and other pathological conditions it actually causes in them, and also creates many other very grave pathological conditions in the internal organisms of bodies consuming it. How can it be called a "health" plan? What's behind it?
"That any so-called "doctors" would persuade a civilized nation to add voluntarily a deadly poison to its drinking water systems is unbelievable. It is the height of criminal insanity.
"No wonder Hitler and Stalin fully believed and agreed from 1939 to 1941 that, quoting from both Lenin's Last Will and Hitler's Mein Kampf: "America we shall demoralize, divide, and destroy from within." ...
"Are our Civil Defense organizations and agencies awake to the perils of water poisoning by fluoridation? Its use has been recorded in other countries. Sodium fluoride water solutions are the cheapest and most effective rat killers known to chemists: colorless, odorless, tasteless; no antidote, no remedy, no hope: Instant and complete extermination of rats. ...
"Fluoridation of water systems can be slow national suicide, or quick national liquidation. It is criminal insanity--treason!" Dr. E.H. Bronner, Mfg. Research Chemist, Los Angeles."
EARLIEST AVAILABLE RUSSIAN FLUORIDE EVIDENCE:
"I, Oliver Kenneth Goff, was a member of the Communist Party and the Young Communist League, from May 2, 1936, to October 9, 1939. During this period of time, I operated under the alias of John Keats with number 18-B-2. My testimony before the Government is in Volume 9 of the Un-American Activities Report for 1939.
"While a member of the Communist Party, I attended Communist training schools in New York and Wisconsin ... and we were trained in the revolutionary overthrow of the U.S. Government.
"... We discussed quite thoroughly the fluoridation of water supplies and how we were using it in Russia as a tranquilizer in the prison camps. The leaders of our school felt that if it could be induced into the American water supply, it would bring about a spirit of lethargy in the nation, where it could keep the general public docile during a steady encroachment of Communism. We also discussed the fact that keeping a store of deadly fluoride near the water reservoir would be advantageous during the time of the revolution, as it would give us opportunity to dump this poison into the water supply and either kill off the populace or threaten them with liquidation, so that they would surrender to obtain fresh water.
"We discussed in these schools, the complete art of revolution: the seizure of the main utilities, such as light, power, gas, and water, but it was felt by the leadership that if a program of fluoridating of the water could be carried out in the nation, it would go a long way toward the advancement of the revolution. "The above statements are true." Oliver Kenneth Goff.
20 years after Mr. Goff was indoctrinated on the Communist purposes of fluoridating U.S. water supplies, in New York there appeared an article in the 13 April 1956 issue of THE COMMUNIST DAILY WORKER entitled "Facts Spur Campaign for Fluoridation Here":
"Politicians of the [New York] City Council and Board of Estimate are timid men who are catering to misguided sentiment, outmoded tradition, and backward fears of the unscientific. A widespread educational campaign among both the politicians and people on the value of the Board of Health's program for fluoridation is certainly indicated."
Note that the DAILY WORKER was commonly used to give widespread advice to all Communists in America. Therefore the above article was official Party line instructions on how to stigmatize people who opposed fluoridation as being "misguided", "outmoded", "backward", and "unscientific." Incidentally, a review of current ADA literature on how to handle opponents to fluoridation parrots that same Party line even today, almost word-for-word. Pure coincidence of course. (Follow the money.)
Just for practice, read the above news quote aloud to a friend, and you'll figure out for yourself if the Communists were only humanely concerned about the dental health of our American children, in 1956.
AMERICA SENT RAT POISON TO STALIN'S SIBERIAN PRISONERS, VIA LEND-LEASE:
Russia's use of sodium fluoride during World War II was entered into the Congressional Record in the early 1950's. USAF Major George R. Jordan testified before Un-American Activity committees of Congress that he had been stationed in Great Falls, Montana during the war as a U.S.-Soviet liaison officer.
Major Jordan stated that one of his tasks had been to procure "vast quantities" of sodium fluoride for shipment to Siberia via numerous Lend-Lease airplanes which we were sending to Russia from Montana, via Canada and Alaska. (7,926 airplanes were sent to Russia via this route.) Major Jordan testified that the Russians openly admitted to
"... using the fluoride in the water supplies in their concentration camps, to make the prisoners stupid, docile, and subservient."
a transcript of Major Jordan's book:
http://www.peg.apc.org/~nexus/mjd1.html
FLUORIDE POLITICS
1952: The Delaney Committee 82nd Congress Hearings on Fluoride revealed that there was no actual scientific basis for the fluoridation of water supplies in the prevention of tooth decay. The recommendation of the Committee was that more research be done, before proceeding with this national mass medication. Their recommendation was totally ignored.
VALID SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENTS NEVER BECOME OUTDATED
"By feeding rats an experimental diet in which care was taken to keep the fluorine content at a minimum, the following observations were made: Reproduction was unaffected; the fluorine content of the bones could be "reduced to between 6 and 25 ppm, and could be eliminated from the teeth, without showing any gross deleterious effect" and no change was produced in the calcium to phosphorus ratio in the bones. This evidence supports the idea that fluorine plays no important useful biologic role."
--Approximately 1,200 mg (1.2 grams) of sodium fluoride ("just a pinch") will kill an adult human being. That was the low estimate that Dominic Smith ingested when he died from an overdose of fluoridated water at Hooper Bay, Alaska on 23 May 1992. (Approximately 200 mg will kill a small child.)
--BOTTOM-LINE LETHAL QUANTITY: Exactly how many lethal doses are disseminated in this manner? Simple math on the above numbers reveals that 140 grams of fluoride per person is dumped into the environment each year. 140 grams of fluoride gives us our rule of thumb of 130 LETHAL DOSES OF FLUORIDE PER PERSON, PER YEAR, DUMPED INTO THE ENVIRONMENT wherever "standard" water fluoridation is used.
--Multiply 130 by 150 million people (the total number of U.S. population currently drinking fluoridated water) and that makes 20 billion lethal doses of fluoride per year, dumped into our environment. That's an additive 10 million tons of rat-poison spread across America yearly, in the name of dental health
"AN OPEN LETTER TO RESIDENTS OF THE OKANAGAN: Dear fellow citizens; I have been a chinchilla rancher in Kelowna since 1952. My herd was healthy and prolific until the introduction of sodium fluoride into Kelowna domestic water. In the first year I noticed no ill effects. After the first year the animals began to die in increasing numbers, and the offspring of such parents proved sterile. As time went on more and more of the animals died soon after birth. By the year 1964 not only was the birth rate of my herd extremely low but 72 percent of those born failed to survive. My herd was then completely bankrupt."
"Another breeder moved into the Kelowna fluoridated area from unfluoridated East Kelowna and his losses were parallel to mine. When by chance we compared notes we discovered that losses to both had commenced after our herds had consumed fluoridated water. My friend never had any such trouble before. Both of us had been successful breeders, and we are both officers of the Chinchilla Breeders Association. When we realized the cause of our troubles we began feeding our chinchillas water that is not polluted with sodium fluoride. Now with pure water we are recovering from our difficulties; but I had to acquire new stock because most of my surviving animals were permanently sterile."
"We learned, by comparing notes with experienced people all over the continent, that our losses are by no means the first in fluoridation history. It is common knowledge among U.S. chinchilla breeders that chinchillas can not tolerate fluoridated water. This is also true of hamsters, guinea pigs, mice, rats, and rabbits. They become sterile and die if they are fed sodium fluoride indefinitely, at "recommended" concentrations and even lower. ..."
What evidence is there of environmental pollution causing problems more close to home? Note USA Today's 28 May, 1993 article entitled DECREASING SPERM COUNTS BLAMED ON ENVIRONMENT: "Dramatic drops in sperm counts in the past few decades may be due to rising levels of environmental estrogen, as well as substances that act like estrogen, a new report says. The amount of sperm produced by the average man has dropped by half in the last 50 years, say researchers in the medical journal LANCET. ..."
INTERESTING FLUORIDE QUOTES
"Fluorides are violent poisons to all living tissue because of their precipitation of calcium. They cause fall of blood pressure, respiratory failure, and general paralysis. Continuous ingestion of non-fatal doses causes permanent inhibition of growth." (U.S. Dispensatory, 24th Edition, pp. 1456-57.)
From proven experiments supported by the Medical Facility of the Univ. of Praetoria, S. Africa: "Long-continued ingestion of minute quantities of fluorine causes disease of the thyroid gland." (Dr. Doug D. Styne, Dept of Pharmacology)
"We ought to go slowly. Everybody knows that fluorine and fluorides are very poisonous substances and we use them in enzyme chemistry to poison enzymes, those vital agents in the body. That is the reason things are poisoned; because enzymes are poisoned, and that is why animals and plants die." Mr. James B. Sumner, Director of Enzyme Chemistry, Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Cornell University, and a Nobel Prize winner for his work in the field of enzyme chemistry.
"Contrary to what is widely assumed, the toxicity of fluoride is not always related to concentration. Under certain conditions fluoride toxicity actually increases as the concentration decreases. This is what is known as a paradoxical effect." Albert Schatz, Ph.D., M.C.R.S., Professor at the Univ. of Chile and co-discoverer of streptomycin.
"Hereford, Texas has been called the TOWN WITHOUT A TOOTH ACHE. This is not true. But the phrase has been used effectively by the people interested in marketing SODIUM FLUORIDE all over the country. ...I believe that fluorine does in a mild way, retard cavities, but I also believe that the damage it does is far greater than any good it may appear to accomplish. It even makes the teeth so brittle and crumbly they can be treated only with difficulty, if at all. The dental investigators who came to our county some fifteen years ago did, in my opinion, make a serious mistake when they gave fluorine the credit for our good teeth, and overlooked the quality of food grown in our rich, well mineralized soil. Every person I found who had no dental caries, consumed much milk. Why use a poison, when correct food will maintain our bodies free from diseases and tooth decay? It is hellish and non-American to put poison in city water supplies and force citizens to drink it." George W. Heard, DDS, 15 March 1954.
PROBLEM: HOW TO GET RID OF A TOXIC HAZARDOUS WASTE?
In 1938, Dr. Gerald Cox, a research fellow of the Mellon Institute, picked up the fluoride ball and began publicly promoting the addition of sodium fluoride to public water systems, claiming that it would reduce tooth decay. The Mellons owned Alcoa, the Aluminum Company of America, who stockpiled quantities of sodium fluoride as a hazardous waste. Two major obstacles to Mr. Cox's promotional campaign were the AMA and the ADA, whose initial position was that fluoride was strictly a poison and that it shouldn't be introduced into the public water supply as a mass-medication. (Reference: AMA Journal, 9/18/43 and ADA Journal, 10/1/44)
In 1945 both Grand Rapids, Michigan and Newburgh, New York were artificially fluoridated with sodium fluoride in their drinking water supply as an experimental procedure to see if fluoride actually would improve dental health. According to testimony of a 1952 Congressional Hearing on Fluoride, the officials in charge of this "experiment" admitted that they hadn't really had prior knowledge of artificial fluoridation with sodium fluoride (versus naturally-occurring calcium fluoride), if it would actually work, nor what side effects it would cause, because the standard scientific laboratory method of first fully testing with animals had been ignored and bypassed in this case of sodium fluoride. (82nd Congress, 2nd Session, Report #2500 - 1952 - House Select Committee)
The Grand Rapids/Newburgh experimental study was originally set up with the intention to last for a full 10 years, after which a proper scientific evaluation of the collected data would have enabled a proper, safe decision to be made regarding fluoridation of the rest of America's drinking water.
However, the U.S. Public Health Service suddenly changed their minds. In 1950, after only 5 years, it was discovered that while the cavity rates had indeed gone down in Grand Rapids, cavity rates had also gone down at a comparable rate in Muskegon, its control city, supposedly because people were becoming more hygiene-conscious. Muskegon was then promptly fluoridated to cover up the discrepancy, and the Grand Rapids fluoridation project was advertised as an unqualified success. (Fluoride the Aging Factor, P.104)
"The data indicated that drinking water with as little as 1 PPM shortened the life span of mice an average of nine per cent. This was true whether death was due to cancer or non-cancerous diseases. The only notice proponents of fluoridation gave to this work was to discredit it as much as possible. ... In experiments where the drug was added directly to suspensions of cancer tissue before inoculation into eggs or mice, sodium fluoride stimulated the growth of cancer tissue in concentrations of one part in more than 20 million. Scientists at Cambridge University (British Medical Journal, Oct 26, 1963) discovered that concentrations of sodium fluoride as low as one part in ten million inhibited the growth of a culture of human tissue. .. the growing weight of scientific evidence that water-borne fluorides, even at 1 ppm, have toxic possibilities must finally be recognized." ALFRED TAYLOR, Ph.D., Clayton Foundation, Biochemical Institute, University of Texas, Austin Texas, 1965.
Some years later Dr. Taylor stated:
"The terrifying conclusion of the studies was that fluorine greatly induced a cancer tumor growth. If doctors and the public can be made aware of this catastrophe, fluoridation shall end quickly. It will someday be recognized as the most lethal and stupid "Health Program" ever conceived by the mind of man, witch doctors and blood-letters not excepted."
DELIBERATE LONG-TERM FLUORIDE OVERDOSE OF ALASKAN SCHOOL CHILDREN:
Keeping Dr. Taylor's findings and his above heartfelt plea in mind, how can the following be justified by any sane scientist:
According to the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services publication "FLUORIDATION CENSUS 1985", which lists the current fluoridation levels of every fluoridated area in the United States, for the entire year of 1985 the U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) deliberately over-fluoridated four Alaskan village schools at the rate of FIVE PARTS PER MILLION, instead of at the currently approved rate of 1 PPM. The schools were Unalaska, St. Michael, Shishmaref, and Stebbins. Why were these unsuspecting people being thus experimented upon? How can five parts-per-million (a whopping 20 milligrams per gallon of water) be justified? Whatever the excuse, such covert slow genocide should be actionable in a court of law. That was just the 1985 record; previous years haven't yet been checked. (A subjective first-hand eyewitness observation, by this author, of the people living in Stebbins and St. Michael in 1995 gave a definite impression of a tragic spiritual wasteland; something seemed very out-of-place with those people, almost like looking into the haunted faces of prisoners in German death camps in World War II. Go see for yourself.)
Vested interests who sell fluoride and pharmaceuticals, or who repair the damage, would have you believe that God screwed up so badly in engineering man's teeth that ALL of mankind is now born with a permanent deficiency of fluoride, and thus mass medication--with a nerve agent--is the most cost effective way to correct God's stupid error. However, the facts state differently. Regarding dental cavities, refined sugar and soda pop are two of the top contenders, whereas a sweeping lifetime-deficiency of rat poison and nerve agents in our bodies is one of the biggest, most blatant lies in all history.
For the benefit of enlightening the U.S. Public Health Service, the ADA, the AMA, and the sugar and soda pop industries, try this complicated scientific experiment: Obtain a couple of extracted teeth, give just one of them a standard stannous fluoride treatment which supposedly proofs it against cavities, soak both of them in Coca-Cola or Pepsi--with a few teaspoons of sugar added--for a couple of weeks, daily changing the liquid and scrubbing the one tooth with fluoridated toothpaste, and then examine the two teeth. That should conclusively prove who is more stupid, God or the broad general public.
An unexplored avenue of interest here is the chemical concoction inside a can of soda pop. Given the above statements about the corrosive action of soda pop, and also given the data on aluminum's probable relationship to Alzheimers disease, and also given the fact that soda pop is made with fluoridated water, and given the fact that poisons combine synergistically, usually in unpleasantly toxic ways, is there ANY guarantee whatsoever that your typical fluorinated can of soda pop will not even slightly assimilate some of the aluminum metal out of the wall of the can, and thus make a synergistic soda-fluoride-aluminum-sugar cocktail that has slow acting, long-term lifetime effects?
Simple research challenge: Find some unopened soda pop that's several years old, and have a laboratory analyze the ingredients to check the aluminum and fluoride concentration.
CONGRESSIONAL INACTION
July 21, 1975: When confronted with new evidence regarding the role of fluoride in causing cancer, U.S. Congressman Delaney recommended immediate suspension of all artificial fluoridation, pending further research. His recommendation was ignored.
Dec. 16, 1975: Congressman Delaney entered into the Congressional Record the results of a new study showing another link between fluoridation and cancer. This time he demanded "that all artificial fluoridation of our water supplies be suspended immediately." Once again, his unprofitable demands were ignored.
DENTAL ASSOCIATION PR LIE REVEALED
THE LIE: August 1, 1979: A letter from the Secretary of the Victorian Branch of the Australian Dental Association stated, "In a community with a fluoridated water supply, the dental manpower required to maintain a good standard of dental health in a community is always halved."
THE TRUTH: The 1976 edition of the C.B.S. News Almanac published figures showing the number of dentists per 100,000 population in 30 "Representative American Cities." Of these 30 cities, 16 were artificially fluoridated. A simple comparison of the fluoridated vs. non-fluoridated cities shows that there were an average of 76.7 dentists per 100,000 population in the fluoridated cities, vs. 59.2 dentists per 100,000 in the non-fluoridated cities. Furthermore, data from the 1971 American Dental Directory, the 1971 U.S. Statistical Abstracts and the 1973 World Almanac reveals that the three American cities which have been fluoridated the longest (Grand Rapids, Newburgh, and Evanston) averaged 121 dentists per 100,000 population, or over twice the national average, after approximately 25 years on fluoridated water. (Data compiled by Phillip R.N. Sutton, D.D.Sc., Melbourne, Australia, 1979.)
JAPANESE FLUORIDE-RELATED CANCER RESEARCH
24 August, 1982: The Japan Times published an article expressing concern about potential hazards of topical fluoride applications (9000 ppm) to teeth, and fluoride mouth rinses (250-500 ppm) has prompted researchers at the Nippon Dental College in Tokyo to investigate effects of fluoride on hamster fetal cell cultures, with results that can only be described as very disturbing. At the August '82 meeting of the Japanese Society for Cancer Research, Associate Professor of Pharmacology Taketi Tsutsui and his colleague, Dr. Maizumi, reported that 24-hour contact with sodium fluoride solutions at concentrations of 34, 45, and 57 ppm (fluorine ion), results in morphological changes and malignant transformations in second-generation hamster fetal cells. After the one-day fluoride treatment, one group of cells was cultured for one week and then fixed and stained for study. Survival rates of 90, 50 and 30% were found for the exposure to 34, 45, and 57 ppm respectively, with morphological changes of 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0% in the surviving colonies. In the untreated control cultures, the incidence of abnormalities was significantly lower -- only 0.03% or less.
In another series of experiments, cells from the 34 and 45-ppm fluoride treatments were found to have acquired the ability to proliferate in soft agar for an additional 50 to 200 days. These cells were then shown to have developed a strong tumor-forming capacity. In the untreated control cultures, neither proliferated in soft agar nor acquisition of tumor-forming capacity were observed, and only one of four cultures had transformed into one having infinite proliferative characteristics.
Between 100 and 200 days after the sodium fluoride treatment, cells from the 34 and 45-ppm treated cultures were transplanted subdermally into each of two 10-hamster groups. The animals were then observed for the appearance of tumors. All surviving three hamsters in the group that received cells from the 34-ppm treated culture developed cancer (fibro-carcinoma) at the site of injection. Likewise, all eight surviving hamsters receiving the 45-ppm treated cells developed cancer. The other hamsters in both groups died from causes other than cancer, before the experiments were completed. None of the hamsters in the control group that received the untreated cells, developed cancer.
DEATH FROM FLUORIDATED WATER, 1992
May 23, 1992: 290 residents of Hooper Bay, Alaska were severely poisoned by sodium fluoride when the city's fluoride dispenser malfunctioned, injecting 150 PPM of fluoride into the drinking water for over a week. Dominic Smith, previously healthy 41 year-old leader of the local National Guard, died of fluoride poisoning after swallowing an estimated 1200-2400 mg of sodium fluoride from the local drinking water supply. One overdose symptom of fluoride is thirst, and Dominic just kept drinking more water until he died.
NUMEROUS U.S. MECHANICAL FLUORIDE DISPENSER FAILURES
Similar malfunctions of fluoridation equipment have occasionally happened nationwide over the past 40 years, each accompanied by a careful news cover-up.
Fluoride dispensing machinery is not perfect. Human overdoses of fluoride can be found in such places as Annapolis, Maryland in 1979, when their water treatment plant dumped up to 50 PPM fluoride into their water supply, giving approximately 50,000 people toxic reactions. Officials kept it quiet for 2 weeks afterwards saying, "We didn't want to jeopardize the fluoridation program."
However, Dr. John Yiamouyiannis studied the Annapolis situation after the spill, and reported his findings in a book, "Fluoride the Aging Factor". On page 63 of his book, he stated that more than 5 times the normal number of people died of heart failure in Annapolis during the week following the fluoride spill.
JUST A SMALL AMOUNT OF FLUORIDE DECREASES REACTION TIME
From an article in the Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 67, No. 2, Pp. 230-238: Researchers in the Dept. of Psychology at Florida International University, North Miami, found a statistically significant delay (almost 1/2 second longer to respond) in visual response to a peripheral light stimulus in subjects given just 1/2 milligram of sodium fluoride. That dose is less fluoride than the amount you get from drinking one cup of coffee or tea made from fluoridated tap water.
FDA NEVER APPROVED CHILDREN'S FLUORIDE SUPPLEMENTS
June 3, 1993: New Jersey State Assemblyman John V. Kelly held a press conference in Room 109 of the New Jersey State House in Trenton, NJ. He requested that the FDA remove all children's fluoride supplements from the market, after he asked the FDA to supply his office with the studies supporting the safety and effectiveness of children's fluoride supplements and the FDA evidently searched their files back to 1939 and reported to him that NO DRUG APPLICATIONS HAD EVER BEEN FILED FOR THESE PRESCRIPTION DRUGS. All children's fluoride supplements, in the FDA's own words, were and are "unapproved new drugs." The pharmaceutical companies have been openly running a scam for years, by selling these products.
Incidentally, fluoride reactions resemble Attention Deficit Disorder in a certain percentage of the population, and especially in hyperactive children. The simple test of this is to get the person under question off of ALL sources of fluoride (fluoridated water, toothpaste, soda pop bottled with fluoridated water, canned soup, etc.) and see if their condition improves over a period of 3-4 weeks. Use distilled water, because most simple charcoal water filters will not remove fluorides. To remove possible variables, also test the child for negative reactions to sugar and sugar-substitutes.
Since 1992 there have been three studies confirming that fluorides affect brain functions. Dr. Robert Isaacson, Binghamton University, New York conducted two studies using low levels of aluminum fluoride and sodium fluoride. The levels were similar to the amounts people are exposed to on a daily basis from fluoridated toothpastes and drinking water. Results showed that both types of fluorides were neurotoxic. The most recent study, "Neurotoxicity of Sodium Fluoride in Rats", Mullenix, et al, published in Neurotoxicology and Teratology 1995, was done using larger doses of sodium fluoride and corroborated the results of both Isaacson studies (1992 &.1994).
All the studies demonstrated that the hippocampal region (learning center) of the brain was the most susceptible to the effects of fluorides.
It was also stated in the study published in Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 1995, Mullenix, et al, that: "Hyperactivity and cognitive deficits are generally linked with hippocampal damage, and in fact, the hippocampus is considered to be the central processor which integrates inputs from the environment, memory, and motivational stimuli to produce behavioral decisions and modify memory." However, the researchers said that although the behavior of rats does not extrapolate to humans, the generic behavioral patterns created in rats from fluoride exposure can and probably do occur in humans. They also said the problems that might occur in humans from typical chronic fluoride exposure during pregnancy and early childhood are: "motor-sensory dysfunction, IQ deficits' and/or learning disabilities" (environmentally induced retardation of brain development).
Documents with regards to the neurotoxic effects of fluoride exposure among the workers who processed uranium for the first nuclear bombs in 1944 were recently declassified by the government. These documents indicate that the US Government has known for more than fifty years that fluorides are neurotoxic. Other studies dating back to 1949 indicate that exposure to fluorides can have neurotoxic effects on animals.
With lethal doses of poisons such as Sarin or sodium fluoroacetate, it would be almost impossible to determine that a person had been poisoned from the fluorinated toxicants. This is because of the bioactivity of the fluorine ion which is in a constant state of transition as it travels through the body. With these fluoride compounds, the examining physician would have to know that a person was exposed to these substances to determine the cause of death, otherwise, it would be written off as heart failure. Diagnosing the effects of chronic, low-level exposure to fluoride compounds would be almost impossible unless appropriate research was done to determine what those adverse affects were and that the physicians were aware of the research.
In essence, it can be said that the ubiquitous fluorine ion when combined with another substance could be the perpetrator of almost perfect neurological or biological crimes. This is because: 1. Neither toxic levels of the fluorine ion nor the accomplice substance can be placed at the scene of the crime in significant amounts to indicate intoxication; 2. Scientists generally discount toxic synergism as a factor with chronic fluoride toxicity; and 3. there is no research data on which to base a diagnosis.
Introducción a la sujeción de Fluoruración
Http://users.rcn.com/mgfree/Medical/Fluorine/FluorineApathy.html
"Una mentira decirle lo suficientemente fuerte y el tiempo suficiente y la gente la creerá". -- Adolfo Hitler.
"Fluoruro es seguro y eficaz en la prevención de la caries dental, y no nuevos estudios de sus efectos en la salud humana son necesarias". (Oficial del dentista Fluoruración folleto PR)
"El sencillo hecho de que el flúor es un veneno insidioso, nocivos, tóxicos y acumulativo en sus efectos, incluso cuando se ingiere en cantidades mínimas, seguirá siendo la misma independientemente de las veces que se repetirá en la prensa que la fluoración del suministro de agua es" seguro "." Ludwig Gross, MD, ex Jefe de la Administración de Veteranos de Investigación del Cáncer, Bronx, NY.
-- Fluorine tiene el efecto más fuerte de todos los halógenos. Flúor es uno de los principales ingredientes en la polémica psico-activa de drogas psiquiátricas PROZAC (Fluoxetene Hydrochloride), y también en el mortal gas nervioso Sarin militar, EE.UU. designación GB. (Isopropílico-metil-Phosphoryl fluoruro).
Una vez que se retire el flúor de Sarin, todo lo que queda es un ácido no tóxico. En otras palabras, flúor - la misma que se flúor en el agua potable - es lo que da su sarin "kick".
-- La fecha y la infame violación de drogas hipnótico "techos" (Rohypnol) es fluorados Valium, que se informa, 20-30 veces más potente que el Valium solo. Tenga en cuenta el siguiente artículo: "DEA QUIERE 'FECHA VIOLACIîN' CLASIFICADOS DE DROGAS. Washington - Un sedante ilegal apodado la" fecha de la violación "de drogas debe poner en la misma categoría que la heroína, la cocaína y el LSD en los próximos tres meses, la Drug Enforcement Administration Dijo el jueves. La agencia recomendó que Rohypnol, conectado a más de 2400 investigaciones penales a nivel nacional, sea declarada la Lista 1 de drogas, la DEA dijo el portavoz Jim McGivney. " (Página 6, Anchorage Daily News, 21 de junio de 1996.)
-- Fluorine general se añade al agua potable hoy estrictamente como la masa de medicamentos, supuestamente para ayudar a los dientes de los niños menores de 14 años de edad. A pesar de la inicial propósito declarado de "ayudar a los dientes de los niños menores de 14 años", nuestras bases militares fueron de los primeros suministros de agua potable fluorurada involuntariamente a ser más de 40 años atrás.
Fluoruro de sodio, una por residuos peligrosos-subproducto de la fabricación de aluminio, es un ingrediente común en ratas y cucarachas venenos, anestésicos, hipnóticos, neurolépticos, militar de gas nervioso, y de los EE.UU. el agua potable.
Anuncios por Alcoa Aluminio recomendar que añadir fluoruro de sodio a nuestro suministro de agua potable, se pueden encontrar en revistas viejas antes de la fluoración de fecha fue oficialmente aprobado por las autoridades. Fluoruro promotor Oscar Ewing, jefe de la Agencia Federal de Seguridad (FSA) superiores a los EE.UU. Servicio de Salud Pública en 1951, abandonó el empleo de aluminio Alcoa no mucho antes que él dirigió los EE.UU. fluoración de la campaña a principios de los años 1950. (Siga el dinero)
Tóxicos de fluoruro de sodio y de sus primos más fluorados tóxicos como fluoruro de potasio históricamente han sido bastante caros de forma adecuada y segura de disponer, hasta alrededor de 1950, cuando algunas industrias con una sobreabundancia de estos desechos tóxicos realmente convencidos de la opinión pública sobre la terrifically loco, pero muy rentable idea de Venderlo al público en un 20000% de marcas, que se inyectan en nuestra agua dulce, y luego POTABLE.
Independiente de la evidencia científica en los últimos 50 años revela que el fluoruro supuestamente acorta nuestra vida, y promueve el cáncer de diversos trastornos mentales, y se acelera la osteoporosis en las caderas rotas viejos, y nos hace estúpidos, dócil y subordinada, todo en un mismo paquete. Un amplio estudio encontró una relación directa entre las zonas en que se fluorada, y los informes de fractura de cadera en las personas mayores.
20.000 dólares de recompensa por cualquier prueba de que el fluoruro de obras. Mick Doctor Robert, DDS, fue uno de los primeros científicos que promueve la fluoración, hasta que hizo su propio estudios en animales sobre fluoruro de sodio a fines del 1940 y luego abruptamente cambiado de opinión después de que las autoridades le ordenó encubrir sus resultados de la prueba. Él se negó, y procedió a hacer más investigaciones sobre esas mismas autoridades.
Dr Mick estudios le llevó a presentar este reto con confianza: "20000 dólares a la primera persona que pueda facilitar una copia de cualquier experimento controlado con cualquiera de los EE.UU. Servicio de Salud Pública (USPHS) recomendó fluoruros en el agua, en la USPHS recomendado por partes - Millones-, lo que demuestra que los fluoruros son venenosas seguro y no causará daño futuro órgano. "
Dr Mick's $ 20000 oferta ha sido válido desde los años 1950, 1991, pero per a la radio, el doctor Mick dijo que nadie había presentado aún una reclamación incluso a él con la esperanza de recoger la recompensa. Su dirección es 916 Stone Road, Laurel Springs, New Jersey. Él puso su dinero donde está su boca, no con la toma. La enfermedad renal, por definición, reduce la eficiencia de los riñones, que es su principal vía de eliminación de fluoruro. Las personas con enfermedad renal también no debe beber agua fluorada. Los casos son en acta (Annapolis, Maryland, 1979), donde los pacientes renales en diálisis máquinas murió, debido a una sobredosis de fluoruro en el suministro de agua de la ciudad. No hay datos en cuanto a qué efectos "estándar" agua fluorada causas a los pacientes renales en diálisis, pero esto debe ser muy cuestionado.
Cuando hizo esto fluoración de la locura empezar?
La primera aparición de agua potable fluorurada se encontró en la Alemania nazi campos de prisioneros, que se mantuvieron en parte por IG Farben. La Gestapo había poca preocupación por los supuestos efectos del flúor sobre los dientes de los niños; su supuesta razón de la masa-medicating agua con fluoruro de sodio fue para esterilizar los seres humanos y les obligue a la calma presentación. (Ref. libro: "La delincuencia y el castigo de IG Farben" por Joseph Borkin.
I.G. FARBEN DESARROLLADOS SARIN FLUORADOS SOMAN NERVIO Y GAS: El nombre de "SARIN" es un acrónimo de los nombres de los cuatro principales IG Farben empleados que participan en su formulación inicial y la producción de químicos: Schrader, Ambros, Rudriger, y Van Der Linde. Otto Ambros es el jefe de producción de I.G. Farben instalaciones de gas venenoso en Alemania. (Ver Ambros' foto en la página 286 del "mundo sin el cáncer" por G. Edward Griffin.)
El sarin se desarrolló para reemplazar Malathion y mortal Zyklon B nervio gases, concretamente, con la intención de exterminar a millones de personas. Fluoruro-teniendo Sarin fue tan fuerte, "Zyklon B se hizo bajo el aspecto desodorante". (La Declaración de Dickinson, "Salud Conciencia", de octubre de 1988)
PROFESIONAL TESTIMONIO:
La siguiente carta fue recibida por la Fundación Lee de Investigaciones Nutricionales, Milwaukee Wisconsin, el 2 de octubre de 1954, de Charles Perkins, un químico:
"Tengo su carta de 29 de septiembre de pedir más documentación en relación con una declaración que hice en mi libro, La Verdad Acerca de Fluoruración del Agua, en el sentido de que la idea de la fluoración del agua fue llevado a Inglaterra desde Rusia por la Rusia comunista Kreminoff.
"En la década de 1930, Hitler y la Alemania nazi del previsto a ser un mundo dominado y controlado por un nazi filosofía de la pan-Germanism. Químicos El alemán elaboró un ingenioso y muy de gran alcance del plan de control de masas-que fue presentado y aprobado a Por el Estado Mayor alemán. Este plan consistía en el control de la población en un área determinada a través de los medicamentos de los suministros de agua potable. Mediante este método se puede controlar a la población en su conjunto las áreas, reducir la población de agua por la medicación que se producen esterilidad en las mujeres, y Etc. En este sistema de control de masas-, fluoruro de sodio ocupado un lugar destacado. ...,
"Administración de dosis repetidas de infinitesimal cantidades de fluoruro en el tiempo que reducir el poder de un individuo para resistir la dominación, por la intoxicación y lentamente narcotizing una zona determinada del cerebro, con lo que le sumisa a la voluntad de los que quieren gobernar. [Un conveniente invisible Lobotomía]
"La verdadera razón detrás de la fluoración del agua no es en beneficio de los niños de los dientes. Si este fuera el motivo real hay muchas maneras en que puede hacerse que es mucho más fácil, más barato y mucho más eficaz. El propósito real detrás de la fluoración del agua es Reducir la resistencia de las masas a la dominación y el control y la pérdida de la libertad.
"Cuando los nazis bajo Hitler decidió ir a Polonia, el alemán y el Estado Mayor General de Rusia Personal militar y científicos intercambiaron ideas, planes, y de personal, y el sistema de control de masas de agua a través de la medicación fue aprovechado por el ruso comunistas porque Encajaba perfectamente en su plan de communize el mundo. ...
", Me dijeron de todo este sistema por un químico alemán, que era un oficial de las grandes industrias químicas Farben y también fue destacado en el movimiento nazi en el momento. Digo esto con toda la seriedad y sinceridad de un científico que ha pasado casi 20 años de investigación sobre la química, bioquímica, fisiología y patología de flúor - toda persona que las bebidas artificialmente fluorados de agua por un período de un año o más nunca volverán a ser la misma persona mental o físicamente ". CHARLES E. PERKINS, Droguería, 2 de octubre de 1954.
Citando a Einstein sobrino, el doctor E.H. Bronner (un químico que también había sido un prisionero de guerra durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial) en una carta impresa en el espejo católica, Springfield, MA, enero de 1952:
"Parece ser que los ciudadanos de Massachusetts se encuentran entre los' seguir 'en el programa de los envenenadores del agua." Hay una siniestra red de agentes subversivos, Godless' intelectual' parásitos, que trabajan en nuestro país cuyas ramificaciones crecen hoy en día más amplio, más Éxito y más alarmante cada año y cuyo verdadero objetivo es desmoralizar, paralizar y destruir nuestra gran República - desde dentro si es que pueden, de acuerdo a su plan - para su propio poder. "Los trágicos éxito que ya han alcanzado en su largo asedio para destruir la fibra moral de la vida americana es ahora uno de sus más potentes de pies hacia su propio final victoria sobre nosotros". Fluoruración de nuestra comunidad de los sistemas de agua puede llegar a convertirse en sus más sutiles armas Para el seguro de nuestro deterioro físico y mental.
"Como un investigador químico de la permanente establecido, construido dentro de los últimos 22 años, 3 de América plantas químicas y 6 con licencia de mis 53 patentes. A partir de mis años de experiencia práctica en la salud de los alimentos y los productos químicos sobre el terreno, quiero advertir: fluoración De agua potable es criminal locura, seguro de suicidio nacional. No lo haga.
"Incluso en pequeñas cantidades, fluoruro de sodio es un veneno mortal para el que no ha sido eficaz antídoto. Cada exterminador sabe que es la más eficiente-rata asesina. ... Fluoruro de sodio es totalmente diferente de calcio orgánico-fluoro-fosfato necesario Por nuestros cuerpos y que proporciona la naturaleza, en la providencia de Dios y gran amor, para crear y fortalecer nuestros huesos y los dientes. Este calcio orgánico-fluoro-fosfato, derivado de los alimentos adecuados, es una sal orgánica comestibles, insolubles en agua y asimilable por El cuerpo humano, mientras que los no orgánicos de fluoruro de sodio utilizado en el agua es instantánea fluoridating veneno para el cuerpo y completamente solubles en agua. El cuerpo se niega a asimilar.
"Ten cuidado, de buena fe y por los experimentos de laboratorio, de investigación patriótica químicos, y la experiencia real de médicos, han puesto de manifiesto que, en lugar de preservar o promover« la salud dental, 'agua potable fluorurada destruye los dientes, antes de la edad adulta y después, por la destrucción de manchas y otros patológicos Condiciones que realmente provoca en ellos, y también crea muchas otras patologías muy graves en el interior de los órganos de los organismos de consumirlo. ¿Cómo puede ser llamado un "salud"? Lo que está detrás de esto?
"Que cualquier llamada" médicos "persuadir nación civilizada para añadir voluntariamente un veneno mortal a sus sistemas de agua potable es increíble. Es el colmo de la locura criminal.
"No es de extrañar que Hitler y Stalin creían plenamente de acuerdo y de 1939 a 1941 que, citando tanto Lenin's Last Will y Mein Kampf de Hitler:" América vamos a desmoralizar, dividir y destruir desde dentro. "...
"¿Son nuestras organizaciones de Defensa Civil y los organismos de despertar a los peligros de la intoxicación por la fluoración del agua? Su utilización se ha registrado en otros países. Fluoruro de sodio del agua son las soluciones más baratas y más eficaces rata asesinos conocidos por los químicos: gas incoloro, inodoro, insípido y no Antídoto, no hay remedio, ni esperanza: instantáneo y completo exterminio de las ratas. ...
"Fluoración de sistemas de abastecimiento de agua puede ser lento suicidio nacional, o nacional de rápida liquidación. Es la locura criminal - traición!" Dr E.H. Bronner, Mfg Investigaciones Químico, de Los Angeles. "
Antiguas disponibles ruso fluoruro de pruebas:
"Yo, Oliver Kenneth Goff, fue miembro del Partido Comunista y la Liga Comunista jóvenes, de 2 de mayo de 1936, de 9 de octubre de 1939. Durante este período de tiempo, bajo el seudónimo de John Keats con el número 18 -- B-2. Mi testimonio antes de que el Gobierno está en el volumen 9 de la Un-American Memoria de Actividades de 1939.
"Mientras que un miembro del Partido Comunista, Comunista asistí a las escuelas de formación en Nueva York y Wisconsin ... y que se capacitó en el derrocamiento revolucionario de los EE.UU..
"... Hemos discutido bastante a fondo la fluoración de los suministros de agua y la forma en que se la utiliza en Rusia como tranquilizante en los campos de prisioneros. Los dirigentes de nuestra escuela consideró que si se pudiera inducida en la Americana el abastecimiento de agua, que traería Acerca de un espíritu de letargo en la nación, en el que podría mantener al público en general dóciles durante una constante invasión del comunismo. También discutió el hecho de que el mantenimiento de una tienda de cerca de la mortal fluoruro de agua sería ventajosa en la época de la revolución, Ya que nos daría oportunidad de volcado de este veneno en el suministro de agua y, o bien matar a la población o los amenazan con la liquidación, para que se entrega para obtener agua dulce.
"Hemos discutido en estas escuelas, completa el arte de la revolución: la toma de las principales empresas de servicios públicos, tales como luz, energía, gas, y el agua, pero la sensación es de los dirigentes que si un programa de fluoridating del agua podrían ser transportados En la nación, sería un gran avance hacia el progreso de la revolución. "Estas declaraciones son verdaderas." Oliver Kenneth Goff.
(Firmado y notariada 6/22/57.)
20 años después de Sr Goff se adoctrina en la comunista fluoridating EE.UU. efectos de los suministros de agua, en Nueva York aparecieron en un artículo el 13 de abril de 1956 EL COMUNISTA cuestión TODOS LOS DIAS LOS TRABAJADORES titulado "Hechos Spur Campaña de Fluoruración Aquí":
"Los políticos de la [Nueva York] Ayuntamiento y Junta de Estimación son los hombres que son tímidos a la restauración equivocado sentimiento, la tradición pasada de moda, y hacia atrás los temores de la científica. Una campaña de educación generalizada tanto entre los políticos y el pueblo en el valor de la Junta De la Salud para el programa de fluoruración es, sin duda, indicó. "
Tenga en cuenta que el trabajador se DIAS comúnmente usado para dar una amplia asesoramiento a todos los comunistas en América. Por lo tanto, el anterior artículo es la línea oficial Partido instrucciones sobre la forma de estigmatizar a las personas que se oponen a la fluoración como "equivocado", "pasada de moda", "atrasados", y "poco científico". Por cierto, una revisión de la literatura actual ADA sobre la manera de tratar a los opositores que la fluoración loros misma línea del Partido, aún hoy, casi palabra por palabra. Pura coincidencia, por supuesto. (Siga el dinero.)
Sólo por práctica, por encima de la lectura en voz alta de noticias cita a un amigo, y ¡descubrir por ti mismo si los comunistas eran sólo humanamente preocupado por la salud dental de nuestros niños, en 1956.
AMÉRICA enviada veneno para ratas STALIN siberiano de los reclusos, se prestan a través de arrendamiento:
Rusia en el uso de fluoruro de sodio durante la Segunda Guerra Mundial se inscribió en el Registro del Congreso a principios de los años 1950. USAF Mayor George R. Jordania-Un testimonio ante los comités de América actividad del Congreso que había sido estacionado en Great Falls, Montana durante la guerra como US-soviética oficial de enlace.
Principales Jordania afirmó que una de sus tareas ha sido la de obtener "enormes cantidades" de fluoruro de sodio para su envío a Siberia a través de numerosas Lend-Lease aviones que se envío a Rusia de Montana, a través de Canadá y Alaska. (7926 aviones fueron enviados a Rusia a través de esta ruta.) Principales Jordania declaró que los rusos abiertamente a
"... El uso de fluoruro en el suministro de agua en sus campos de concentración, para hacer a los prisioneros estúpido, dócil y subordinado."
Una transcripción de las principales Jordania el libro:
Http://www.peg.apc.org/ ~ nexus/mjd1.html
FLUORURO POLíTICA
1952: El Comité Delaney 82o Congreso audiencias sobre Fluoruro reveló que no existía verdadera base científica para la fluoración de los suministros de agua en la prevención de la caries dental. La recomendación de la Comisión es que más investigaciones por hacer, antes de continuar con esta medicación en masa nacional. Su recomendación fue totalmente ignorada.
Válido experimentos científicos nunca están desfasados
"Mediante la alimentación de las ratas una dieta en la que se trató de mantener el contenido de flúor en un mínimo, se formularon las siguientes observaciones: La reproducción no se afectó; el flúor contenido de los huesos podría ser" reducido a entre 6 y 25 ppm, y podría Ser eliminada de los dientes, sin mostrar ningún efecto perjudicial bruto "y no se produce en la proporción de calcio a fósforo en los huesos. Esta evidencia apoya la idea de que el flúor no desempeña ningún papel biológico importante útil".
-- Aproximadamente 1200 mg (1,2 gramos) de fluoruro de sodio ( "sólo una pizca") matar a un ser humano adulto. Esa fue la baja estimación que Dominic Smith ingeridos cuando murió de una sobredosis de agua fluorada en Hooper Bay, Alaska, el 23 de mayo de 1992. (Aproximadamente 200 mg de matar a un niño pequeño.)
-- FIN-LINE LETHAL CANTIDAD: exactamente cuántas dosis letal se difunden de esta manera? Simple matemáticas en el número anterior revela que 140 gramos de fluoruro por persona es objeto de dumping en el medio ambiente cada año. 140 gramos de fluoruro nos da nuestra regla de oro de 130 LETHAL DOSIS DE FLUORURO POR PERSONA, POR AÑO, EN EL MEDIO AMBIENTE objeto de dumping de lo "normal" es la fluoración del agua utilizada.
-- Multiplica 130 por 150 millones de personas (el número total de la población de EE.UU. Actualmente, el agua potable fluorurada), y que hace 20 millones de dosis letal de fluoruro por año, en prácticas de dumping en nuestro medio ambiente. Eso es un aditivo de 10 millones de toneladas de veneno de rata de propagación a través de América anuales, en el nombre de la salud dental
"UNA CARTA ABIERTA A LOS RESIDENTES DE LA OKANAGAN: Queridos conciudadanos; he sido una chinchilla ganadero en Kelowna desde 1952. Mi rebaño es saludable y prolífica hasta la introducción de fluoruro de sodio en Kelowna agua de uso doméstico. En el primer año no me di cuenta de los malos Efectos. Después del primer año los animales comenzaron a morir en un número cada vez mayor, y los hijos de esos padres resultaron estériles. A medida que pasaba el tiempo más y más de los animales murieron poco después del nacimiento. En el año 1964 no sólo fue la tasa de natalidad de Mi rebaño extremadamente bajo, pero el 72 por ciento de los nacidos no sobreviven. Mi rebaño fue entonces completamente en quiebra. "
"Otro obtentor se trasladaron a la zona de Kelowna fluorada unfluoridated Kelowna Oriental y sus pérdidas fueron paralelas a la mía. Cuando por casualidad se compararon notas descubrimos que las pérdidas para ambos había comenzado después de que nuestros rebaños habían consumido agua fluorada. Mi amigo nunca tuvo problemas para cualquiera de esos Antes. Ambos de nosotros había tenido éxito ganaderos, y que son a la vez funcionarios de la Asociación de Criadores de Chinchilla. Cuando nos dimos cuenta de la causa de nuestros problemas de alimentación que comenzamos nuestra chinchillas agua que no está contaminada con fluoruro de sodio. Ahora, con el agua pura, que se están recuperando De nuestras dificultades, pero he tenido que adquirir nuevas acciones, ya que la mayoría de mis animales supervivientes fueron permanentemente estéril ".
"Hemos aprendido, comparando notas con personas con experiencia en todo el continente, de que nuestras pérdidas no son en modo alguno la primera de fluoración de la historia. Es de conocimiento común entre los EE.UU. chinchilla chinchillas criadores que no pueden tolerar el agua fluorada. Esto también es cierto en el caso de hámsters , Cobayas, ratones, ratas y conejos. Se convierten en estériles y mueren si son alimentados con fluoruro de sodio indefinidamente, en "recomendado" concentraciones e incluso inferior. ... "
¿Qué pruebas hay de la contaminación ambiental que provoca problemas más cerca de casa? Nota EE.UU. de hoy 28 de mayo, 1993 el artículo titulado DECREASING ESPERMA BLAMED CUENTAN SOBRE EL MEDIO AMBIENTE: "gotas dramáticas en el recuento de espermatozoides en las últimas décadas puede ser debido al aumento de los niveles de estrógenos ambientales, así como de las sustancias que actúan como estrógenos, dice un nuevo informe . La cantidad de esperma producido por el hombre promedio se ha reducido a la mitad en los últimos 50 años, dicen los investigadores en la revista médica LANCET. ... "
Interesante fluoruro comillas
"Fluoruros son violentos venenos a todos los tejidos vivos, debido a su precipitación del calcio. Causan caída de la presión arterial, la insuficiencia respiratoria, y la parálisis general. Continua ingestión de dosis no mortales causas permanentes de inhibición de crecimiento." (U. S. Dispensatory ª, 24 ª edición, pp. 1456-57.)
Desde demostrado experimentos apoyados por el Servicio Médico de la Univ. De Praetoria, S. África: "Long-continuó la ingestión de pequeñas cantidades de flúor provoca la enfermedad de la glándula tiroides". (Dr. D. Doug Styne, Departamento de Farmacología)
"Tenemos que ir despacio. Todo el mundo sabe que el flúor y los fluoruros son muy tóxicos y sustancias que utilizamos en la química a la enzima de veneno enzimas, los agentes vitales en el cuerpo. Esa es la razón las cosas se envenenan, porque las enzimas son envenenadas, y que Es por ello que los animales y las plantas mueren ". James B. Sumner, director de Enzimas de Química, Departamento de Bioquímica y Nutrición, Universidad de Cornell, y un ganador del Premio Nobel por su trabajo en el campo de la química de la enzima.
"Contrariamente a lo que se supone generalmente, la toxicidad de fluoruro no siempre está relacionada con la concentración. Bajo ciertas condiciones flúor aumenta la toxicidad como la concentración disminuye. Esto es lo que se conoce como un efecto paradójico". Albert Schatz, Ph.D., MCRS, Profesor de la Univ. De Chile y co-descubridor de la estreptomicina.
"Hereford, Texas, que se ha denominado la CIUDAD SIN UN DIENTE ACHE. Esto no es cierto. Pero la frase se ha utilizado de manera efectiva por las personas interesadas en la comercialización SODIO FLUORURO en todo el país. ... Creo que el flúor tiene un leve Manera, retardar cavidades, pero también creo que el daño que hace es mucho mayor que cualquier bien que pueda parecer a lograr. Incluso hace de los dientes de manera frágil y crumbly que pueden ser tratados sólo con dificultad, en todo caso. Investigadores El dental Que vino a nuestro país hace unos quince años hizo, en mi opinión, hacen un grave error cuando se dio el flúor crédito para nuestra buena dentadura, y pasa por alto la calidad de los alimentos cultivados en nuestra rica y bien mineralizados del suelo. Todas las personas que he encontrado No tenían caries dental, consume mucha leche. ¿Por qué utilizar un veneno, cuando la alimentación correcta mantendrá nuestro cuerpo libre de enfermedades y la caries dental? Es infernal y no estadounidense para poner veneno en la ciudad el suministro de agua y obligar a los ciudadanos a beber. " George W. Heard, DDS, el 15 de marzo de 1954.
Problema: ¿cómo deshacerse de los residuos peligrosos tóxicos A?
En 1938, el doctor Gerald Cox, un investigador del Instituto Mellon, recogió la pelota y comenzó fluoruro públicamente la promoción de la adición de fluoruro de sodio a los sistemas públicos de agua, alegando que reduciría la caries dental. El Mellons propiedad de Alcoa, la Compañía de Aluminio de América, que almacenan cantidades de fluoruro de sodio como residuos peligrosos. Dos principales obstáculos al Sr Cox's campaña de promoción se la AMA y de la ADA, cuya posición inicial era que el fluoruro es un veneno estrictamente y que no debe ser introducido en el suministro público de agua como una masa de la medicación. (Referencia: AMA Diario, 9/18/43 y ADA Diario, 10/1/44)
En 1945 ambos Grand Rapids, Michigan y Newburgh, Nueva York fueron artificialmente fluorada con fluoruro de sodio en su abastecimiento de agua potable como un procedimiento experimental para ver si realmente fluoruro mejoraría la salud dental. De acuerdo con el testimonio de una Audiencia en 1952 del Congreso de fluoruro, los funcionarios a cargo de este "experimento" admitieron que en realidad no habían tenido conocimiento previo de la fluoración artificial con fluoruro de sodio (versus naturales de fluoruro de calcio), en caso de que en realidad el trabajo , Ni qué efectos secundarios que causa, debido a que el método estándar de laboratorio científico de la primera plenamente pruebas con animales han sido ignoradas y, en este caso, al margen de fluoruro de sodio. (82o Congreso, 2 ª Sesión, Informe # 2500 - 1952 - Casa Comité)
El Grand Rapids / Newburgh estudio experimental fue originalmente creado con la intención a la última para un pleno de 10 años, después de que una adecuada evaluación científica de los datos recogidos se han permitido una adecuada, segura decisión que habría que adoptar con respecto a la fluoración del resto de la America's Agua potable.
Sin embargo, los EE.UU. Servicio de Salud Pública de repente cambiaron de opinión. En 1950, después de sólo 5 años, se descubrió que si bien las tasas de la cavidad ha ido en Grand Rapids, cavidad tasas también había pasado a un ritmo comparable en Muskegon, el control de su ciudad, supuestamente porque las personas son cada vez más conscientes de la higiene - . Muskegon fue rápidamente fluorada de ocultar la discrepancia, y la fluoración de Grand Rapids proyecto fue anunciado como un éxito rotundo. (Fluoruro el Factor de Envejecimiento, P.104)
"Los datos indicaron que el agua potable con tan poco como 1 ppm acortar el período de vida de los ratones un promedio de nueve por ciento. Esto es cierto si la muerte se debió a cáncer o enfermedades no cancerosas. El único aviso proponentes de la fluoración dio a este Trabajo fue que para desacreditar la medida de lo posible. ... En los experimentos en el que el medicamento se ha añadido directamente a las suspensiones de cáncer de los tejidos antes de la inoculación en huevos o ratones, fluoruro de sodio estimulado el crecimiento del cáncer de los tejidos en las concentraciones de una parte en más de 20 Millones. Científicos en la Universidad de Cambridge (British Medical Journal, 26-oct-1963) descubrió que las concentraciones de fluoruro de sodio tan bajo como una parte en diez millones inhibió el crecimiento de una cultura de los tejidos humanos. .. El creciente peso de la evidencia científica de que el agua - Sufragados fluoruros, incluso a 1 ppm, tienen posibilidades tóxicos deben ser reconocidos finalmente ". ALFRED TAYLOR, Ph.D., Clayton Fundación, Instituto de Bioquímica, Universidad de Texas, Austin, Texas, 1965.
Algunos años más tarde doctor Taylor declaró:
"La terrible conclusión de los estudios es que el flúor un cáncer inducido en gran medida el crecimiento del tumor. Si los médicos y el público puede ser conscientes de esta catástrofe, la fluoración terminará rápidamente. Se algún día ser reconocido como el más letal y estúpido" Programa de Salud " Jamás concebidos por la mente del hombre, los médicos y brujas de sangre cartas no exceptuado ".
Deliberada a largo plazo sobredosis de flúor ALASKAN niños de la escuela:
Mantener doctor Taylor conclusiones y sentidas por encima de su motivo en mente, ¿cómo puede ser la siguiente justificada por ningún científico cuerdo:
De acuerdo con los EE.UU. Departamento de Salud y Servicios Humanos de la publicación "FLUORIDATION CENSO 1985", que enumera los actuales niveles de fluoración de cada área fluorada en los Estados Unidos, para todo el año 1985 de los EE.UU. Oficina de Asuntos Indios (BIA) deliberadamente sobre - Fluorada cuatro escuelas de las aldeas de Alaska, a razón de CINCO MILLONES POR PARTES, en lugar de en la actualidad la tasa aprobada de 1 ppm. Las escuelas fueron Unalaska, San Miguel, Shishmaref, y Stebbins. ¿Por qué son estas personas no sospechan que se experimentó por lo tanto, a? ¿Cómo cinco partes por millón (a la friolera de 20 miligramos por galón de agua) se justifica? Sea cual sea la excusa, por ejemplo lento genocidio encubierto debe ser recurribles ante un tribunal de justicia. Ese fue sólo el acta 1985; años anteriores aún no se han comprobado. (A subjetiva testigo de primera mano de observación, de este autor, de las personas que viven en la Stebbins y San Miguel en 1995 dio una clara impresión de un trágico baldío espiritual, algo que parece muy fuera de lugar con las personas, casi como buscando En el atormentado rostro de los prisioneros en campos de la muerte alemanes en la Segunda Guerra Mundial. Ir vea por usted mismo.)
Estoy de acuerdo, jarabo. Creo que la fluorización del agua es el invento masónico-comunista más monstruoso y peligroso al que nos hemos enfrentado: una sustancia extraña se introduce en nuestros preciados fluidos corporales con el desconocimiento del hombre y contra su voluntad.
Jarabo, ¿te das cuenta de que aparte de fluorizar el agua están estudiando la forma de fluorizar la sal, la harina, la fruta, los zumos, las sopas, el azúcar, la leche, el helado? ¡Los helados, Jarabo! ¡Los helados de los niños!
Los intereses creados que venden el fluoruro y los productos farmacéuticos, o reparar el daño que, a su juicio, habría que Dios follar hasta tanto en la ingeniería del hombre que TODOS los dientes de la humanidad se ha nacido con una deficiencia permanente de flúor, y por lo tanto la masa de medicamentos - con un Agente nervioso - es la más rentable forma de corregir Dios estúpido error. Sin embargo, los hechos estado diferente. En cuanto a la caries dental, el azúcar refinado y la soda pop son dos de los principales contendientes, mientras que un barrido de toda la vida-la deficiencia de veneno de rata y agentes neurotóxicos en nuestros cuerpos es una de las mayores, más flagrantes mentiras en toda la historia.
Para el beneficio de los EE.UU. esclarecedor Servicio de Salud Pública, la ADA, la AMA, y el azúcar y soda pop industrias, pruebe este complicado experimento científico: Obtener un par de dientes extraídos, dar sólo una de ellas un estándar de tratamiento de fluoruro que supuestamente Las pruebas que contra las caries, remoje las dos en la Coca-Cola o Pepsi - con algunas cucharaditas de azúcar añadido - durante un par de semanas, que cambia diariamente el líquido y el lavado de dientes con una pasta dental fluorada, y luego examinar los dos Dientes. Esto debería demostrar concluyentemente que es más estúpido, Dios o el amplio público en general.
Un camino inexplorado de interés aquí es la química dentro de las latas de soda pop. En vista de lo anterior las declaraciones acerca de la acción corrosiva de soda pop, y también teniendo en cuenta los datos sobre la probable relación de aluminio a enfermedad de Alzheimer, y también dado el hecho de que la soda pop se hace con agua fluorada, y dado el hecho de que los venenos combinar sinérgicamente, por lo general en Desagradablemente tóxicos maneras, hay NINGUNA garantía alguna de que su fluorados pueden típico de soda pop ni siquiera un poco asimilar algunas de las de aluminio metal de la pared de la lata, y, por tanto, hacer una sinergia de sosa-fluoruro de aluminio de azúcar cóctel que ha De acción lenta, a largo plazo efectos vida?
Investigación simple desafío: Encuentre algunos sin abrir soda pop eso es varios años, y tiene un laboratorio de análisis de los ingredientes, para comprobar la concentración de fluoruro de aluminio y.
CONGRESSIONAL INACTION
21 de julio de 1975: Cuando se enfrenta con nuevas pruebas relativas a la función de fluoruro en causar el cáncer, el congresista Delaney EE.UU. recomendó la suspensión inmediata de todos los fluoración artificial, a la espera de nuevas investigaciones. Su recomendación fue ignorada.
Diciembre 16, 1975: congresista Delaney entró en el Registro del Congreso de los resultados de un nuevo estudio que muestra una relación entre el cáncer y la fluoración. Esta vez, exigió \\\"que todos los fluoración artificial de nuestro suministro de agua se suspenderá de inmediato\\\". Una vez más, su poco rentable demandas fueron ignoradas.
Asociación dental PR mentira reveló
LA LIE: 1 de agosto de 1979: Una carta del Secretario de la Subdivisión de Victoria de la Asociación Dental de Australia declaró: "En una comunidad con un suministro de agua fluorada, la mano de obra dentales necesarios para mantener un buen nivel de salud dental en una comunidad es Siempre reducido a la mitad. "
LA VERDAD: La edición 1976 de la C.B.S. News Almanac published figures showing the number of dentists per 100000 population in 30 "Representative American Cities." Of these 30 cities, 16 were artificially fluoridated. A simple comparison of the fluoridated vs. non-fluoridated cities shows that there were an average of 76.7 dentists per 100000 population in the fluoridated cities, vs. 59.2 dentists per 100000 in the non-fluoridated cities. Furthermore, data from the 1971 American Dental Directory, the 1971 US Statistical Abstracts and the 1973 World Almanac reveals that the three American cities which have been fluoridated the longest (Grand Rapids, Newburgh, and Evanston) averaged 121 dentists per 100000 population, or over twice the national average, after approximately 25 years on fluoridated water. (Data compiled by Phillip RN Sutton, DDSc., Melbourne, Australia, 1979.)
JAPANESE FLUORIDE-RELATED CANCER RESEARCH
24 August, 1982: The Japan Times published an article expressing concern about potential hazards of topical fluoride applications (9000 ppm) to teeth, and fluoride mouth rinses (250-500 ppm) has prompted researchers at the Nippon Dental College in Tokyo to investigate effects of fluoride on hamster fetal cell cultures, with results that can only be described as very disturbing. At the August '82 meeting of the Japanese Society for Cancer Research, Associate Professor of Pharmacology Taketi Tsutsui and his colleague, Dr. Maizumi, reported that 24-hour contact with sodium fluoride solutions at concentrations of 34, 45, and 57 ppm (fluorine ion), results in morphological changes and malignant transformations in second-generation hamster fetal cells. After the one-day fluoride treatment, one group of cells was cultured for one week and then fixed and stained for study. Survival rates of 90, 50 and 30% were found for the exposure to 34, 45, and 57 ppm respectively, with morphological changes of 0.1, 0.5, and 1.0% in the surviving colonies. In the untreated control cultures, the incidence of abnormalities was significantly lower -- only 0.03% or less.
In another series of experiments, cells from the 34 and 45-ppm fluoride treatments were found to have acquired the ability to proliferate in soft agar for an additional 50 to 200 days. These cells were then shown to have developed a strong tumor-forming capacity. In the untreated control cultures, neither proliferated in soft agar nor acquisition of tumor-forming capacity were observed, and only one of four cultures had transformed into one having infinite proliferative characteristics.
Between 100 and 200 days after the sodium fluoride treatment, cells from the 34 and 45-ppm treated cultures were transplanted subdermally into each of two 10-hamster groups. The animals were then observed for the appearance of tumors. All surviving three hamsters in the group that received cells from the 34-ppm treated culture developed cancer (fibro-carcinoma) at the site of injection. Likewise, all eight surviving hamsters receiving the 45-ppm treated cells developed cancer. The other hamsters in both groups died from causes other than cancer, before the experiments were completed. None of the hamsters in the control group that received the untreated cells, developed cancer.
DEATH FROM FLUORIDATED WATER, 1992
May 23, 1992: 290 residents of Hooper Bay, Alaska were severely poisoned by sodium fluoride when the city's fluoride dispenser malfunctioned, injecting 150 PPM of fluoride into the drinking water for over a week. Dominic Smith, previously healthy 41 year-old leader of the local National Guard, died of fluoride poisoning after swallowing an estimated 1200-2400 mg of sodium fluoride from the local drinking water supply. One overdose symptom of fluoride is thirst, and Dominic just kept drinking more water until he died.
NUMEROUS US MECHANICAL FLUORIDE DISPENSER FAILURES
Similar malfunctions of fluoridation equipment have occasionally happened nationwide over the past 40 years, each accompanied by a careful news cover-up.
Fluoride dispensing machinery is not perfect. Human overdoses of fluoride can be found in such places as Annapolis, Maryland in 1979, when their water treatment plant dumped up to 50 PPM fluoride into their water supply, giving approximately 50000 people toxic reactions. Officials kept it quiet for 2 weeks afterwards saying, "We didn't want to jeopardize the fluoridation program."
However, Dr. John Yiamouyiannis studied the Annapolis situation after the spill, and reported his findings in a book, "Fluoride the Aging Factor". On page 63 of his book, he stated that more than 5 times the normal number of people died of heart failure in Annapolis during the week following the fluoride spill.
JUST A SMALL AMOUNT OF FLUORIDE DECREASES REACTION TIME
From an article in the Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 67, No. 2, Pp. 230-238: Researchers in the Dept. of Psychology at Florida International University, North Miami, found a statistically significant delay (almost 1/2 second longer to respond) in visual response to a peripheral light stimulus in subjects given just 1/2 milligram of sodium fluoride. That dose is less fluoride than the amount you get from drinking one cup of coffee or tea made from fluoridated tap water.
FDA NEVER APPROVED CHILDREN'S FLUORIDE SUPPLEMENTS
June 3, 1993: New Jersey State Assemblyman John V. Kelly held a press conference in Room 109 of the New Jersey State House in Trenton, NJ. He requested that the FDA remove all children's fluoride supplements from the market, after he asked the FDA to supply his office with the studies supporting the safety and effectiveness of children's fluoride supplements and the FDA evidently searched their files back to 1939 and reported to him that NO DRUG APPLICATIONS HAD EVER BEEN FILED FOR THESE PRESCRIPTION DRUGS. All children's fluoride supplements, in the FDA's own words, were and are "unapproved new drugs." The pharmaceutical companies have been openly running a scam for years, by selling these products.
Incidentally, fluoride reactions resemble Attention Deficit Disorder in a certain percentage of the population, and especially in hyperactive children. The simple test of this is to get the person under question off of ALL sources of fluoride (fluoridated water, toothpaste, soda pop bottled with fluoridated water, canned soup, etc.) and see if their condition improves over a period of 3-4 weeks. Use distilled water, because most simple charcoal water filters will not remove fluorides. To remove possible variables, also test the child for negative reactions to sugar and sugar-substitutes.
Since 1992 there have been three studies confirming that fluorides affect brain functions. Dr. Robert Isaacson, Binghamton University, New York conducted two studies using low levels of aluminum fluoride and sodium fluoride. The levels were similar to the amounts people are exposed to on a daily basis from fluoridated toothpastes and drinking water. Results showed that both types of fluorides were neurotoxic. The most recent study, "Neurotoxicity of Sodium Fluoride in Rats", Mullenix, et al, published in Neurotoxicology and Teratology 1995, was done using larger doses of sodium fluoride and corroborated the results of both Isaacson studies (1992 &.1994).
All the studies demonstrated that the hippocampal region (learning center) of the brain was the most susceptible to the effects of fluorides.
It was also stated in the study published in Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 1995, Mullenix, et al, that: "Hyperactivity and cognitive deficits are generally linked with hippocampal damage, and in fact, the hippocampus is considered to be the central processor which integrates inputs from the environment, memory, and motivational stimuli to produce behavioral decisions and modify memory." However, the researchers said that although the behavior of rats does not extrapolate to humans, the generic behavioral patterns created in rats from fluoride exposure can and probably do occur in humans. They also said the problems that might occur in humans from typical chronic fluoride exposure during pregnancy and early childhood are: "motor-sensory dysfunction, IQ deficits' and/or learning disabilities" (environmentally induced retardation of brain development).
Documents with regards to the neurotoxic effects of fluoride exposure among the workers who processed uranium for the first nuclear bombs in 1944 were recently declassified by the government. These documents indicate that the US Government has known for more than fifty years that fluorides are neurotoxic. Other studies dating back to 1949 indicate that exposure to fluorides can have neurotoxic effects on animals.
With lethal doses of poisons such as Sarin or sodium fluoroacetate, it would be almost impossible to determine that a person had been poisoned from the fluorinated toxicants. This is because of the bioactivity of the fluorine ion which is in a constant state of transition as it travels through the body. With these fluoride compounds, the examining physician would have to know that a person was exposed to these substances to determine the cause of death, otherwise, it would be written off as heart failure. Diagnosing the effects of chronic, low-level exposure to fluoride compounds would be almost impossible unless appropriate research was done to determine what those adverse affects were and that the physicians were aware of the research.
In essence, it can be said that the ubiquitous fluorine ion when combined with another substance could be the perpetrator of almost perfect neurological or biological crimes. This is because: 1. Neither toxic levels of the fluorine ion nor the accomplice substance can be placed at the scene of the crime in significant amounts to indicate intoxication; 2. Scientists generally discount toxic synergism as a factor with chronic fluoride toxicity; and 3. there is no research data on which to base a diagnosis.
ahhh claro, la pasta libre de fluor, ecológica, progre y sostenible... pues nada, si tienes el tiempo suficiente como para patearte bsucando una tienda de perroflautas de comercio justo donde vendan eso, adelante. Yo tengo ocupaciones más importantes.
Son excusas de mal pagador, pero me parece perfecto. Supongo que tampoco tienes sal en casa ni una farmacia cerca para el perborato.
Hace tiempo vi un documental en el que unos aldeanos africanos en una choza mísera renunciaban a practicar la ablación del clítoris a su hija porque veían que era malo para su salud y que además era un riesgo grave de infección y muerte. Supongo que también tendrían cosas mejores que hacer que hablar con aquél periodista que les exponía el tema.
Desgraciadamente veo que aquí en occidente hay gente que no ha llegado todavía a ese nivel de desarrollo...
cide mejor hagan como hacen en el c ampo argentino..mulen un trocito de carbon casi picadillo y se pasan por los diente y ah ah ah..que blancos y sanos que tien los dientes los campesinos,despues una hoja de naraho..la planta de naranjo..sacan la hojita y a mastican...dientes blancos perfectos y olor a naranho..ke lindo..
Las típicas payasadas de siempre de los típicos payasos de siempre y qué casualidad, ni un argumento en contra. Ni señal de haber leído nada...ganado, ciertamente.
Argumento en contra de qué, pelmazo, si tu hilo es una petición de ayuda a difundir una cadena sobre la fluorización y el campo de concentración planetario...
Publicado por: zoidzillaArgumento en contra de qué, pelmazo, si tuhiloes una petición de ayuda a difundir unacadenasobre la fluorización y el campo de concentración planetario...
Hombre, zoo-rilla, me habría gustado leer algún argumento en contra antes de las descalificaciones.
Ah, y el hilo no es una petición de ayuda para crear una cadena, que debe ser la única forma de difusión que usas. Más bien para enviarlo a gente que pueda interesarse por el tema y difundirlo en medios de comunicación, por ejemplo. Aunque admito que no quedaba muy claro, así que por esta vez, pase.
A Anarrow le regalaremos un ejemplar de la subespecie escorpión de esos peces que tanto le gustan...y que se lo meta por donde más le guste...jajaja...
Como no estoy seguro de encontrarlo, este también puede valer
Tendría su lógica, por la misma razón que el ácido úrico se usa en las cremas de manos. Ahora bien, teniendo en cuenta que los romanos no sabían lo que nosotros de microorganismos...bueno, en fin...no parece 100% recomendable...jaja