Liberal

Primero se quejan de que el modelo neoclásico habla de que la información es perfecta, para después decir:

"The goal of this research is a new scientific conceptualization of economics and economic modeling which can provide reliable advice in constructing, running and regulating financial institutions and markets so that they serve the purpose of growth and stability in the standard of living of all people. Financial firms and markets must innovate to serve their larger purpose in providing efficient capital flows for the growth and innovation of real goods and services as well as a safe repository for our collective savings. Innovation in methods of speculation that are unrelated to stable production of goods and services and the efficient flow of capital within the system must be recognized and discouraged."

"What we can aim for is a financial system similarly designed and regulated according to sound and tested scientific principles so that crashes and crises once a decade or so become a thing of the past, and in which innovation of goods and services thrives in a stable economic environment."

O sea que los mamertos estos que entran a mezclar los métodos de distintas ciencias pueden saber qué inversiones van a resultar y cuáles no, qué decisiones son las apropiadas y cuáles las equivocadas, en un mercado distorsionado por la intervención(que tanto adoran). Bah, aunque da gracia, "cientí­ficos" vendiéndonos que se puede volar con solo agitar los brazos.

eso de intervenir para dopar la economí­a suena a patear para adelante los problemas y dejar que la bola de nieve siga creciendo.

al igual que en un esquema de ponzi, nadie quiere que se corte, pero todos saben que cuanto más tiempo siga peores serán sus consecuencias.